
RCaro Textile Weave (basket weave) Quilt, 2004, 55" x 55" silk and cotton, machine pieced, hand quilted.
Quilt patterns are the traditional (and contemporary) way that quilts designs have been exchanged and passed from one person to the next. Much has been said about how patterns are tools for knowledge transfer and for biographical and narrative meaning. In addition some patterns have seen a large amount of variation as quiltmakers have found creative license within the bounds of the patterns key characteristics.
The new and improved Quilt Index contains a database of quilt images searchable by pattern. The variations within a single pattern are obvious. The variation or combination of patterns is also evident. The Quilt Index represents a sampling of quilts that have survived and been recorded during one or another state quilt index.
I mention light along with pattern in the title of this entry in order to ask certain questions having to do with collected quilts, traditionally recognizable patterns, uncollected quilts, numbers of quilts, quiltmakers, and how quiltmakers transform light and power in their work.
The concepts that buttress my understanding of quiltmaking are: light and stitch or weave structure, use, size of quilts in relation to the body, and the quiltmakers choice within a system of market driven forces.
Continuing on from the last post regarding light, fabric and power in Polynesia I am relating this notion of power to the use of the quilt and to the vertical presentation of quilts in spaces where light is controlled and quilts are objectified.
Look again at an image of one of my quilts:

There are reasons why I chose to photograph the quilt and present it electronically in this context. None of those choices have anything to do with an acknowledged sense of how light is transformed in the quilt and how that might be represented. The process of image capture and presentation has nothing to do with this level of power conceived of for the quilt.
The image of the quilt "reduces" the quilt to something else- a pattern, a composite wholeness that is created through the image being reduced. I would suggest that this same process takes place on a museum wall, and is further reduced via the space of the museum that holds (controls power and meaning) objects.
Ultimately the "patterns" that are created are hegemonic- reducing choices and obscuring possibilities and opportunities that light and fabric afford the quiltmaker. Lost knowledge is a problem for quilts where the data of maker, time and place and context are "missing." This is in itself a pattern of loss that quilt study aims to modify with variations of data collection that record varying levels of contextual complexity. The preservation of the quilt qualities is in this data. There are of course other quilt databases that aim to preserve the more qualitative context and data for individual quilts and their makers.
The question that this continuum of patterns raises for me is: What "opportunities are afforded" (props to Webb Keane for that question) or not afforded by the products and processes of the contemporary quilt market that is created based on a prioritizing of quilt images where the power of the quilt is controlled and marginalized? The quilt market would have the quiltmaker believe that the opportunities lie within the process of making quilts that extend these patterns. I would ask: Why are there quilts on walls?










